During a recent meditation, I asked about if someone likes to know more about “the later Taoism”, which materials are better to start with. (My understanding is that “the early Daoism/Taoism” was taught by Xuanyuan Huangdi but due to Satan’s influence, most of the teachings/texts were lost in time, which was from about 10,000 years ago to 4000 years ago. From the period of time around the Zhou dynasty Laozi contacted with GOD Michael and GOD Michael taught the Daoism again to Laozi to now, I will call it “the later Daosim/Taoism”. )
GOD Michael commented that for most people, from the texts currently we had, the writings of Tao Te Ching by Laozi together with the writings by Zhuangzi would be easier to start with, then the fragmented available texts of (Xuanyuan) Huangdi Yin Fu Jing and Xuanyuan Huangdi’s other writings (because texts from Xuanyuan Hangdi are highly fragmented, in a higher level and more difficult to understand) and/or others’ Taoism writings are good to read too.
I asked how readable The Daozang (道藏, a large canon of Taoist writings collection starting from the Tang dynasty, consisting of around 8000 volumes of texts) is. GOD Michael commented that about 60% of The Daozang 道藏 is readable and that all content about making of immortality pill (“Lian dan shu” 炼丹术) in Taoism and most of the Taoist spells are distortions from Satan, and should be discarded.
May 16, 2026
———-
Sharing below channeling script from Q’uo(consists of our guardians Ra, Latwii and Latonn from the Confederation of Planets) about Laozi and Mahatma Gandhi.
“K: …Is there any example of someone known to us in third density who has balanced love and wisdom?
Q’uo: …Sorting through this instrument’s mind to see the characters on the world stage of whom she is aware,(Note: she wouldn’t know about Xuanyuan Huangdi and he is the founder of Taoism) we would choose two entities about whom to speak with you this day. The first is the [one known as] Lao-Tzu. (Laozi) In terms of personal details, this entity is lost in the fabric of pre-history, having been a part of an ancient culture at a time when that culture was far closer to its heyday. The writings of this teacher were cryptic and brief and yet we would recommend them to one who wishes to look for the twin strains of love and wisdom appearing in a balanced manner. The characteristic of such energy reflected into third density is that characteristic known as paradox or self-contradiction. You may fruitfully see those characteristics played out in this entity’s writing.
In the balance between love and wisdom, there is always the quality of paradox. The key to understanding such writings within third density is to focus on the common ground that is held by both self-contradictory ways of thinking that are the dynamics of a particular bit of writing. When you look for the commonality in such dynamics, you can begin to see the direction of thinking which is the special province of one who is working with the concept of the unifying principle undergirding both love and wisdom.
The other character whose name we would mention at this time is that of Mahatma Gandhi. This entity was an entity which came into incarnation to work upon that balance between love and wisdom as a sixth-density wanderer. This entity worked substantially in his early life in areas of fairness and justice. At a later point in this entity’s life he founded a spiritual community. And in the third phase of this entity’s life he worked to ground an entire nation of diverse people in that sweet spot or common area that is in dwelt both by love and wisdom.
He found ways to encourage fairness and justice while never releasing concerns for love itself. In the writings and actions of this entity also lie valuable lessons in the keys to combining love and wisdom in creative and sustainable ways. Is there another query at this time?”
Sourced from: https://www.llresearch.org/channeling/2006/0116